<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: mod_rails vs thin vs ebb vs mongrel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arie</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-21431</link>
		<dc:creator>Arie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-21431</guid>
		<description>Thin and Mongrel are just Ruby webservers, not load balancers. 

If you need a general load balancer, look at Apache2&#039;s mod_proxy or nginx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thin and Mongrel are just Ruby webservers, not load balancers. </p>
<p>If you need a general load balancer, look at Apache2&#8242;s mod_proxy or nginx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-21424</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-21424</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t understand and haven&#039;t learned either ruby or its framework rails. But really read the mongrel and thin servers several  times. are those server softwares dedicated to the ruby web application? can there be load-balancer for the web applications based upon other language?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t understand and haven&#8217;t learned either ruby or its framework rails. But really read the mongrel and thin servers several  times. are those server softwares dedicated to the ruby web application? can there be load-balancer for the web applications based upon other language?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vs</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-19890</link>
		<dc:creator>vs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-19890</guid>
		<description>vs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-18565</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-18565</guid>
		<description>Good info thanks!  I&#039;m very curious to see what the memory usage was on these though??

I would happily sacrifice 10% in speed if it meant half the memory usage or something similar.

Thanks!
Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good info thanks!  I&#8217;m very curious to see what the memory usage was on these though??</p>
<p>I would happily sacrifice 10% in speed if it meant half the memory usage or something similar.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arie</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-18366</link>
		<dc:creator>Arie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-18366</guid>
		<description>10000 requests with a concurrency of 10, and 10000 requests with a concurrency of 50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10000 requests with a concurrency of 10, and 10000 requests with a concurrency of 50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ming</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-18365</link>
		<dc:creator>ming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-18365</guid>
		<description>Could you explain what means 
-n 10000 -c 10
-n 10000 -c 50

Maybe some update for mod_rails + nginx? :)

Thx for your work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you explain what means<br />
-n 10000 -c 10<br />
-n 10000 -c 50</p>
<p>Maybe some update for mod_rails + nginx? <img src='http://ariekanarie.nl/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thx for your work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arie</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>Arie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t recommend Apache at all for serving Thin. Nginx is a lot more efficient at serving static files and load balancing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t recommend Apache at all for serving Thin. Nginx is a lot more efficient at serving static files and load balancing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinooz</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-1534</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinooz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-1534</guid>
		<description>I wonder what is the memory usage on the server, what would be more effective many Thin processes behind Apache load balancer or a single Apache with lots of child processes ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what is the memory usage on the server, what would be more effective many Thin processes behind Apache load balancer or a single Apache with lots of child processes ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Motte &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Passenger (mod_rails) versus Thin on nginx</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Motte &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Passenger (mod_rails) versus Thin on nginx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s a good post on Passenger versus Thin, and here is a better benchmark that includes thin on nginx. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s a good post on Passenger versus Thin, and here is a better benchmark that includes thin on nginx. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamhost and mod_rails for your tiny Rails application &#124; alex brie . net</title>
		<link>http://ariekanarie.nl/archives/51/mod_rails-vs-thin-vs-ebb-vs-mongrel/comment-page-1#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamhost and mod_rails for your tiny Rails application &#124; alex brie . net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 03:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariekanarie.nl/?p=51#comment-963</guid>
		<description>[...] performance tests show it to be pretty fast, and it uses shared memory in a better way than mongrel, making it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] performance tests show it to be pretty fast, and it uses shared memory in a better way than mongrel, making it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
