Comments on: Ruby web server performance

By: mod_rails vs thin vs ebb vs mongrel | Arie’s Blog

mod_rails vs thin vs ebb vs mongrel | Arie’s Blog — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:30:17 +0000

[...] the recent release of mod_rails, I thought it was time for yet another benchmark. Mod_rails aims to make deployment of RubyOnRails applications comparable to deploying a [...]

By: Arie

Arie — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:09:44 +0000

The tests were done on a Dell D830 with Intel T7300CPU, 7200RPM disk and 2GB of RAM.

The data was fetched from DB once, and from than on it was fragment cached. The only query left at that point was the one checking for the currently logged in user.

By: Thomas Glasgow

Thomas Glasgow — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:01:21 +0000

Hi,

Can you provide the hardware specs please?

And also, the page you test against, does it fetch its data from the DB or is it hardcoded in a view and/or controller?

My benchmarks resulted in 2x less performance when my application connects to the DB.

By: Arie’s blog » Blog Archive » Yet another Ruby server

Arie’s blog » Blog Archive » Yet another Ruby server — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:00:20 +0000

[...] my benchmark I used the same application I used for my previous benchmark, only this time I benchmarked some extra [...]